- Microsoft lays out SQL Server road map
- Credit card skimming
- Nortel's stock market capitalization plummets
- The Obama campaign's Search Engine to Nowhere
- Will Apple be forced to make more money?
Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:Application Performance Solutions | App Performance | Networking Solution | SafeGuard Enterprise Solution Center | SOA | Test your Web Filter | Value of WDS
With network-attached storage devices selling for just a few hundred bucks per terabyte, and online service providers offering e-mail and full productivity applications for a few dollars per user per month, Microsoft's Small Business Server 2008 is entering into a tougher market than its older siblings have had to endure.
Microsoft's response? Let's paint SBS 2008 with the Vista brush and focus more on features that target the external, Internet side of the bundle instead of the traditional internal file-server side. In fact, Microsoft stresses the "application server" aspect of SBS 2008 far more than its file, print and workgroup server features. That said, after taking a close look at SBS 2008 RC0 (Microsoft recently released RC1 but there is not a significant delta between what we tested and that new beta code), we're not sure Microsoft is making any better a case for this version than for previous ones. Microsoft plans to formally launch SBS 2008 in November.
Included applications aren't new, just upgraded. Exchange 2007 replaces Exchange 2003, and the same upgrade goes for SharePoint. Security applications like Live OneCare and Forefront Security for Exchange are trial versions, only good for three or four months. File server user access controls are the norm for Microsoft, meaning they still offer less granular user management than pre-Linux NetWare. The best addition to the bundle is a second server license, but the price increase means larger customers (up to 75 users are supported) will pay more, in many cases, than they did for SBS 2003.
Microsoft says 80% of SBS software purchases arrive on new hardware, so we tested SBS 2008 RC1 pre-installed on a Dell PowerEdge T605 server. Except for the actual loading of DVD disks, we can't see we saved any time with the pre-loaded version. Worse, downloading four patches for various installed Microsoft applications (but this is beta code, we must remember) kept interrupting the process. Let's hope there's less patching with the shipping version, because it will be aggravating for small businesses to pay third-party installation technicians to sit and wait for update download and subsequent reboot processes to complete.

Microsoft SQL Sever's relatively low cost, steadily increasing capabilities and ease of deployment...
HP Polyserve software for SQL ServerThe success of SQL Server has given rise, to a huge growth in the number of servers dedicated to...
Easing the Migration to Microsoft SQL Server 2005There are many business and technological reasons for making the move to SQL Server 2005 and SQL...

Microsoft SQL Server has enjoyed phenomenal success as a database server. Its relatively low cost,...
Migrating to Windows Vista: Necessity and OpportunityThe Vista era of Windows is here. Yet most organizations will retain Windows XP alongside new Vista...
PoE Plus: Impact on the PoE MarketThe standard for Power over Ethernet (PoE), IEEE Std. 802.3af(tm)-2003, advanced networking,...

Discover why Unified Threat Management Firewalls are ready for the enterprise today. High...
Comments (2)
SBS2008By Anonymous on August 18, 2008, 1:09 pmFor SQL backbone access, SBS is still a steal for cost (unless you can get away with free SQL options).Sharepoint is still an ugly duckling but given a chance it...
Reply | Read entire comment
SBS 2008: a lukewarm reviewBy Microsoft Subnet on July 21, 2008, 5:35 pmBetween this lukewarm review of Small Business Server 2008 and the fact that it was conspicuously absent from the 2008 TechEd conference, it's hard not to wonder...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments