Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close
Cisco vs. Microsoft
Cisco: It's all about the hardware | Cisco Case study: Bank shaves 40% off telecom costs Microsoft: It's all about software | Microsoft case study: Gibson Guitar strikes chord with unified communications | Slideshow: Side-by-side comparison of Cisco and Microsoft unified communications solutions

Cisco: It's all about the hardware

Network-based approach offers single-vendor solution for all types of devices
By Jim Duffy , Network World , 06/02/2008
  • Share/Email
  • Comment
  • Print

Cisco's approach to unified communications is a network-based, hardware-intensive implementation designed to provide support for more environments – like point-of-sale systems, non-PC workgroups and mobile device platforms – than desktop- or server-based strategies.


Read how Microsoft approaches unified communications.
Watch our head-to-head comparison of Cisco vs. Microsoft UC solutions.


But like Microsoft and its Windows desktop/server-based unified communications vision, Cisco's plan is founded on protecting its business and selling as much Cisco equipment into the enterprise as possible.

"Both of them want pretty much a single vendor solution with the exception that I don't see any indication, nor should there be, that Cisco would go into the e-mail, messaging or calendaring area," says Elizabeth Herrell, an analyst at Forrester Research. "But other than that they all want to say we're one vendor, buy it all from us."

Indeed, a description of Cisco's all-encompassing unified communications portfolio begins with a listing of virtually every enterprise router in the Cisco inventory, from the 800 series to the 7500 series. It also includes five models from the company's Catalyst switch line as well as various gateways and access devices.

In all, 29 infrastructure products are included in Cisco's unified communications portfolio. And that doesn't include the 92 other customer contact, IP telephony, unified communications applications, collaboration – including WebEx – and voice network management tools that fill out Cisco's unified communications roster.

Analysts say Cisco's all-in-one, largely proprietary approach provides reliability, greater control, and consistent security and QoS from the endpoint through the network. But therein lies its downside as well – an environment requiring lots of devices and limited inclusion of non-Cisco gear.

"What's thrown back at Cisco is just the fact that they do require a lot of different servers for specific capabilities," says Matthias Machowinski, directing analyst for enterprise voice and data at Infonetics Research. "That seems to be their main knock whereas some other vendors are more integrated, especially once you scale down. If you're a company with 100 people and now you have to deploy 10 servers for [unified communications], that's going to be a problem."

  • Share/Email
  • Comment
  • Print
Partner Content
Foundry Networks

The Foundry Enterprise Advantage

Foundry Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: FDRY) is a leading provider of high-performance enterprise and service provider switching, routing, security and Web traffic management solutions. Foundry's customers include the world's premier ISPs, metro service providers, and enterprises.

For further information on Foundry Networks please click here.

Leveraging the Advantages
of a Multi-vendor Network Strategy

Today's enterprise network provides more than simply a technology infrastructure. It's an enabler for the enterprise, supporting mission critical applications, creating operational efficiencies and increasing productivity gains. Foundry Networks provides the ideal foundation for a multi-vendor network.

Click here to view whitepaper!

Comments (9)
Login
Forgot your account info?

Huh?By Anon2 on June 5, 2008, 1:02 ambeep... beep... nada. To think Cisco won't release a real migration strategy for the CUCM-BE is silly. I guarantee you'll migrate it to be part of a CUCM...

Reply | Read entire comment

PoE CommentBy Anonymous on June 5, 2008, 12:55 amZues' quote is pretty amusing. "Pre-standard or non-standard." Think about it for a second: before there was a PoE standard Cisco created their own; what else...

Reply | Read entire comment

Print EditionBy Anonymous on June 4, 2008, 5:30 pmSo who made the decision to have the last 3 words of the article missing from the print edition? "mobile clients participate" is covered by the add on p 32.

Reply | Read entire comment

dude skinny is as much aBy Anonymous-99 on June 4, 2008, 1:34 pmdude skinny is as much a modification of sip as it is of h323... if you actually look at it you'll see its very similar to mgcp and not h323/sip.

Reply | Read entire comment

Cisco development ecosystem?By Anonymous on June 4, 2008, 11:55 amMy experience with Cisco's channel and system integration partners around the bay area convinces me that they can provide very little help of any type.

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed