- 12 myths about how the Internet works
- Smartphone smackdown: Storm vs. iPhone
- IETF: Should we ignore the Kaminsky bug?
- Top 10 wicked cool algorithms
- How to recession-proof yourself
Senior Editor Denise Dubie guides you through the latest developments in management tools and services.
The incumbent management technology market leaders BMC, CA, HP and IBM manage to stay ahead of a pack of would-be contenders, but industry watchers argue the time might be coming in which the competition might have a shot at unseating one of the big four management vendors.
Forrester Research recently released a pair of reports discussing the vendors most likely to upset the status quo among management software vendors BMC, CA, HP and IBM. While it is difficult to fathom multibillion-dollar companies like HP and IBM losing ground in one of the many markets they dominate, BMC and CA are considerably smaller companies that represent an attractive acquisition target for large vendors hoping to establish themselves as management technology providers.
"If you look at the market caps for HP and IBM, they are both well into the billions of dollars. They are just enormous companies, no one is going to acquire them," says Glenn O'Donnell, a senior analyst with Forrester Research who recently released a paper on "Managing the IT Management Software Portfolio." "CA and BMC are significantly smaller companies, but also companies with solid technology which makes them very appealing and not that big of a bite for the likes of Oracle or Microsoft."
O'Donnell details in the report how enterprise IT managers will have to change their approach to maximizing the use of the numerous management software applications in house, which could change if the vendor landscape alters. While in "The IT Management Software Challengers," Forrester Research analysts Jean-Pierre Garbani and Peter O'Neill discuss some of the potential competitors the big four face today.
To start, ASG worked in 2007 to expand its business service management (BSM) efforts. The company, which has been developing management software since 1986, has made inroads with mid-market that the big four haven't completely penetrated and has sustained strong financial performance. Yet the company suffers still from a lack of brand recognition and needs to incorporate application management and IT process automation into its product suite,
Microsoft, for its part, is a worldwide market leader in many areas and the company continues to focus on the management of Windows-centric data centers. But with the release of Hyper-V and other virtualization products, Microsoft has vowed to become vendor-agnostic in its management capabilities. While Microsoft could prove a competitor via acquisition, Forrester analysts say its current offerings keep it in an operating system management niche.
Denise Dubie is senior editor with Network World.
Partner Content
NetScout and analyst Jim Metzler have teamed to deliver a series of IT Briefs on Network and Application Performance Management leveraging research from NetScout’s nGenius & Sniffer users.
www.netscout.com
Metzler on CIO Priorities
The top five CIO priorities based on a survey of NetScout users revealing CIOs' top priorities and what they think they should be. Also includes interviews with CIOs of large organizations.
Read the Report
Metzler on Application Delivery
How to eliminate the stovepiped or siloed nature of application delivery from both an organization and a technological perspective.
Read the Brief
Metzler on Network Troubleshooting
Overview of network troubleshooting that provides an assessment of where we are, and where we need to be relative to the complexities of today's IT challenges.
Read the Brief
Comments (2)
A little bit more on why they are facing this competitionBy Anonymous on October 2, 2008, 9:47 amApplication Performance Management
Reply | Read entire comment
feature lists are futile, SaaS is a game changerBy matthewfrench9 on October 1, 2008, 2:40 pmNone of these vendors bring anything new to the systems management market other than acquired virtualization technology. For the most part, its still the same old...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments