It seems to be missing the point. Deploy another piece of tin to manage the virtual environment.
Surely a Virtual Appliance would be a more sensible solution?
|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
|
|
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary 
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info [589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos] [407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"? [1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games [682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow] [578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX [1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow] [409]
|
|
Application performance
It seems that the move to transaction based application performance management is making SLAs much easier to track.
Heres an article to check out: Application Performance Management
very interesting product.
Far more advanced than F5 solution
Post new comment