Every decent NAC vendor offers similar functionality. Known/unknown, trusted/untrusted, time-based scans, etc. NetClarity isn't even a player in the NAC space - their existence isnt't even acknowledged in the Forrester NAC report, nor many other industry analyses. This isn't news.
|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
|
|
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary 
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info [589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos] [407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"? [1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games [682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow] [578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX [1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow] [409]
|
|
The first comment was spoken by a truly scared competitor. Much
Thank you for your harsh words. Any chance you can take this fight out into the market place or an independent lab review instead of dirtying up Network World's kind coverage of NetClarity?
My name is here. What is your name and your company name? Would you please share that with the NWW reader/audience?
I thought not.
Warmest regards,
Gary S. Miliefsky
Founder, NetClarity, Inc.
To anonymous, Apparently you have an ax to grind, but that does
To anonymous,
Apparently you have an ax to grind, but that doesn't change the fact that a vendor with products to sell and customers to reference has upgraded its product, information that could help potential customers sort out which NAC gear to buy. That makes it valuable to our readers who can decide for themselves whether vendors deserve to be considered players. The idea is to spread information, not suppress it.
Tim Greene
Post new comment