Would it kill you to define an acronym before you use it 24 times?
|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
|
|
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary 
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info [589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos] [407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"? [1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games [682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow] [578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX [1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow] [409]
|
|
The never-ending challenge for a trade publication/site
At what point does an acronym become so accepted that we no longer have to define it, and start annoying regular readers who want us to just get on with it and make our point already?
Still, online, at least, we should at least link the first reference of something to some background information on it.
If you're reading NETWORKWORLD you should know what NAC stands f
If you're reading NETWORKWORLD you should know what NAC stands for!
Post new comment